![]() |
|
Insect Management & Insecticide
Evaluations, Illinois 1996
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficacy of registered and experimental insecticides for control of European corn borer in Illinois, 1996John T. Shaw, Michael E. Gray, Kevin L. Steffey and James W. Finger |
|
Summary |
A trial was established at the University of Illinois to compare the effectiveness of registered and experimental insecticides for control of first-generation European corn borer. All treated plots had significantly fewer borer cavities per plant than the untreated control. Only the TD2351-04 4FM treatment (0.75 lb[AI]/acre) was not significantly different from the untreated control plots regarding cavity length per plant and percent of plants with cavities.
|
Plot Information and Methods |
|
Location |
University of Illinois Foundation Shaw Farm, Urbana, Illinois. |
|
Plot Size |
Each plot consisted of 4 (30-inches wide) rows by 60 feet long with 4 replications. Treatments were applied to the center 2 rows of each plot leaving 2 untreated rows between each plot. |
|
Experimental Design |
A randomized complete block design with 4 replications was utilized. Two untreated control plots were included in each replication and were averaged for the ANOVA. |
|
Planting Date and Agronomic Factors |
See Table 10.1. |
|
Weather Information |
See Appendix A, Table A.4 and Table A.5 |
|
Soil Information |
See Appendix B |
|
Manual ECB Infestation |
On July 18 and 19, 15 consecutive plants in each of the middle 2 rows of a 4-row plot were infested by placing 2 ECB egg masses (black-head stage) in the whorl of each plant on each date. On the day of infestation, corn plants were in the V9 to V11 development stage (Ritchie et al. 1993, How A Corn Plant Develops, Iowa State University, Cooperative Extension Service.) |
|
Pre-Treatment Population |
On August 1, (two days prior to treatment) 20 infested plants were examined for surviving ECB larva. An average of 1.6 larvae per plant was recorded. |
|
Method of Insecticide Application |
All insecticide treatments were applied with a modified John Deere 6000 high-clearance vehicle (HCV). Granular insecticides were metered through Noble units mounted in brackets on the rear of the HCV. The Noble units were driven with electric motors, and the granules were applied over the whorls in a 7-inch band. The banders were similar to banders on conventional row-planters that are used to deliver soil insecticides. Liquid insecticides were applied with 2 8003 TeeJet flat fan nozzles (1 per row), in a band over the row, with a compressed-air system calibrated to deliver 11 gpa at 15 psi and a speed of 2.5 mph. The height of the nozzles above the whorls was 10 to 12 inches. |
|
Post-Treatment Evaluations of Injury |
On August 26, 10 corn plants (5 from each of the middle 2 rows) that were manually infested were split with a corn knife for evaluation. The number of plants with cavities and the total length of cavities per plant were recorded. The mean percentage of plants with cavities and the mean percentage control (based on the untreated check) were determined for each plot (Table 10.2). The length of stalk tunneling (inches) per plant and the number of cavities per plant were also determined (Table 10.3). |
|
Statistical Analysis |
Data were analyzed with the Pesticide Research Manager version 5.0, from Gylling Data Management, Inc.(GDM). |
|
Other Observations |
During the mixing process it was noted that the TD2351-04 4FM went into solution quite well, much better than most. |
|
Results and Discussion |
The untreated control plots had significantly more cavities per plant and higher percentages of plants with cavities than the insecticide-treated plots. The TD2351-04 4FM treatment was the only treatment that was not significantly different from the untreated control for the mean percentage of plants with cavities and the mean cavity length per plant. For the most part the granular formulations of registered chemicals performed better than liquid formulations, with the 2 Pounce 1.5G and the 2 Dipel (10G and 5SG) treatments being the top performers. The liquid formulations of Decis 180EC, Warrior 1EC, TD2351-01 4FM, Mustang 1.5EC, and TD2344-02 .83E all were found not to be significantly different from the top performing granular treatments. |
|
References Cited |
How a Corn Plant Develops, Special Report, No. 48, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service, Ames, Iowa. Ritche et al. Reprinted June, 1993. |
|
Table 10.1: Agronomic factors for First-generation European corn borer efficacy trial, Urbana, Illinois, 1996 |
|
Variables |
Urbana |
|
Planting date |
June 17 |
|
Hybrids |
Ill. Foundation Seed |
|
Plant population |
26,100 |
|
Row spacing |
30-inch |
|
Soil condition |
moist |
|
Previous crop |
Corn (1995) |
|
Soil insecticides |
none |
|
Herbicides |
Dual II 2 pt/A postemergence |
|
Fall tillage |
Chisel plow |
|
Spring tillage |
Disk, Tilthmaster |
|
Infestation dates Corn developmental stage |
July 18 and July 19 V-9 to V-11 |
|
Treatment date |
August 3 |
|
Evaluation date |
August 26 |
|
Table 10.2 Mean percent of plants with cavities and percentage control after manual infestation for first-generation of European corn borer, Urbana, Illinois 19961 |
|
Treatment |
Rate2 |
Placement |
Mean % of plants with cavities3 |
% Control4 |
|
Pounce 1.5G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
2.50 g |
96 |
|
Dipel 10G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
7.50 fg |
88 |
|
Pounce 1.5G |
10 lb prod./acre |
band |
10.00 fg |
85 |
|
Dipel 5SG |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
15.00 efg |
77 |
|
Decis 180EC |
0.16 |
broadcast |
17.50 d-g |
73 |
|
Warrior 1EC |
0.025 |
broadcast |
17.50 d-g |
73 |
|
TD2351-01 4FM |
0.75 |
broadcast |
20.00 d-g |
69 |
|
Mustang 1.5EC |
0.047 |
broadcast |
22.50 c-g |
65 |
|
TD2344-02 .83E |
0.03 |
broadcast |
22.50 c-g |
65 |
|
Scout X-tra .9EC |
0.016 |
broadcast |
25.00 c-f |
62 |
|
Penncap-M 2EC |
0.75 |
broadcast |
27.50 c-f |
58 |
|
Mustang 1.5EC |
0.038 |
broadcast |
32.50 b-e |
50 |
|
TD2351-02 4FM |
0.75 |
broadcast |
32.50 b-e |
50 |
|
ABG-6422 5SG |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
37.50 bcd |
42 |
|
M-Peril 4.5G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
37.50 bcd |
42 |
|
MYD-2049 4.5G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
42.50 bc |
35 |
|
TD2351-04 4FM |
0.75 |
broadcast |
50.00 ab |
23 |
|
Control |
65.00 a |
0 |
||
|
1 On July 18 and 19 plots were infested by placing 2 ECB egg masses (black-head stage) in the whorl of each plant on each date. Evaluations were made on August 26. 2 All rates specified as lb (AI)/acre. Unless noted otherwise 3 Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P=0.05; Duncan's New MRT). 4 Percent control is based on the reduction of the total number of cavities per plant from the untreated control. |
||||
|
Table 10.3 Mean number of cavities per plant and mean cavity length per plant (inches) after manual inoculation of first-generation European corn borers, Urbana, Illinois 19961 |
|
Treatment |
Rate2 |
Placement |
Mean number of cavities per plant3 |
Mean cavity length per plant (in)3 |
|
Pounce 1.5G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
0.03 h |
0.01 e |
|
Dipel 10G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
0.08 gh |
0.16 de |
|
Pounce 1.5G |
10 lb prod./acre |
band |
0.10 fgh |
0.14 de |
|
Dipel 5SG |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
0.15 e-h |
0.13 de |
|
Decis 180EC |
0.16 |
broadcast |
0.20 d-h |
0.14 de |
|
Warrior 1EC |
0.025 |
broadcast |
0.20 d-h |
0.25 de |
|
TD2351-01 4FM |
0.75 |
broadcast |
0.25 d-h |
0.35 cde |
|
Mustang 1.5EC |
0.047 |
broadcast |
0.28 c-h |
0.33 cde |
|
TD2344-02 .83E |
0.03 |
broadcast |
0.30 c-h |
0.43 cde |
|
Scout X-tra .9EC |
0.016 |
broadcast |
0.32 c-h |
0.29 de |
|
Mustang 1.5EC |
0.038 |
broadcast |
0.35 c-g |
0.39 cde |
|
Penncap-M 2EC |
0.75 |
broadcast |
0.40 c-f |
0.62 cd |
|
M-Peril 4.5G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
0.43 cde |
0.53 cd |
|
ABG-6422 5SG |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
0.43 cde |
0.62 cd |
|
TD2351-02 4FM |
0.75 |
broadcast |
0.48 bcd |
0.57 cd |
|
MYD-2049 4.5G |
5 lb prod./acre |
band |
0.57 bc |
0.80 bc |
|
TD2351-04 4FM |
0.75 |
broadcast |
0.75 b |
0.90 ab |
|
Control |
1.23 a |
1.45 a |
||
|
1 On July 18 and 19 plots were infested by placing 2 ECB egg masses (black-head stage) in the whorl of each plant on each date. Evaluations were made on August 26. 2 All rates specified as lb (AI)/acre, unless noted otherwise. 3 Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P=0.05; Duncan's New MRT). |
||||
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
||
|
College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences Crop Sciences | Entomology Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Illinois Natural History Survey |
|
| |
Integrated Pest Management Copyright © 2004 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |